What is your facility doing to combat MRSA?
How one healthcare facility is successfully implementing an aggressive MRSA screeening program for all patients prior to hospitalization
By Carina Stanton, MA
Senior News Editor/Writer
![]() Janis Bartel ![]() Loyola University Medical Center |
In January Loyola University Medical Center in Chicago began pre-admission screening of all surgical patients to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, commonly known as MRSA, as part of an aggressive MRSA screening program introduced last year. Pre-admission MRSA screening is the third stage in the busy teaching hospital's multistep implementation process to adopt MRSA screening for all patients. The program's aim is simple-promoting patient safety. Janis Bartel, MSN, RN, CIC, Loyola's Infection Control Practitioner, estimates that 8% of incoming patients are MRSA-positive. "By prescreening all surgical patients for MRSA we can catch these patients early to put their isolation and treatment plans in place before they enter the facility," she said. While many facilities screen high-risk patients for MRSA, Loyola is one of the first in the country to screen all patients who are planning to be admitted. The facility began taking a proactive approach to combating MRSA in 2004 after seeing an increase in neonatal babies with MRSA. To gain control of the problem, Bartel and other members of a multidisciplinary team established several interventions, including screening to track MRSA strains and hand hygiene-education programs. A surgical intensive care unit MRSA screening program for surgical intensive-care patients was piloted at the facility in 2005. Pre-admission screening, along with interventions such as increased hand washing, led to a marked decrease in hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), Bartel said. "When compared to MRSA infection rates prior to screening and interventions, it was found that 75% fewer patients had HA-MRSA," she noted. The success of the pilot programs led Loyola to consider implementing screening on a larger scale-a plan that got a push forward when Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) signed the MRSA Screening and Reporting Act into law in August 2007. The statute requires Illinois hospitals to enforce contact-isolation precautions and hand hygiene policies, to perform annual facility-wide infection-control risk assessments and to conduct active MRSA screening for all ICU and other high-risk patients. "Many of our patients are high-acuity, so considering this new law and the results we were seeing through the pilot programs, it just made sense to screen all planned patients prior to hospitalization," Bartel said. Bartel attributes the smooth transition of active MRSA screening at Loyola University Medical Center to three key elements: testing technologies, collaborative communication and evidence-based resources. Testing technology "With this fast turn-around time we can coordinate testing with the admission process so nurses can be ready if a patient tests positive for MRSA," Bartel explained. "I think this is the future of testing for MRSA because it is so fast. The technology also allows us to find if patients are infected or colonized with MRSA, and it can test for other organisms, as well." The PCR testing technology enables tracking of specific strains of MRSA, which helps infection-control practitioners have a better understanding of the types of MRSA they need to identify when patients begin treatment for the disease. The testing process begins when a patient comes to the facility and is screened for MRSA. A nose swab is taken as part of the pre-admission process, and the swab test is taken directly to the lab. During the testing period, the patient is moving through the admission process. If the patient turns out to be MRSA-positive, he or she can be put into isolation to begin treatment directly following admission. Collaborative communication This task force includes administrators from each department, nurses, physicians, informatics specialists, infection-control practitioners, lab staff and public relations staff. They all work together to coordinate the guidelines, education and communication steps needed to facilitate the MRSA screening program. Screening prompts also are built into the facility's electronic medical record system. "My role is to do the data collection screening for MRSA screens, but an important part of the program also includes patient education and guidelines so the nurses have a guide to follow when implementing MRSA-positive procedures," Bartel noted. Implementing the proactive MRSA screening program has not been easy, Bartel acknowledged. "This is a lot of added responsibility for all facility staff because it requires extra personal protective equipment, extra signage, extra isolation carts and special room-blocking procedures in the event we have to isolate an MRSA-positive patient in one of our two-bed rooms. But, it's worth it," she affirmed. "We are now finding patients with MRSA much earlier, and we are now able to prevent some serious infections after surgery." Evidence-based resources "We were inventing the wheel with this new program," Bartel recalled. "So much work had to be done once we began developing the facility-wide program. But having the pilot programs in place was an invaluable tool because we had measurements and learned how to optimize this program and address challenges we otherwise would have been dealing with on such a larger scale following facility-wide screening." In addition to her facility's benchmark data, Bartel's team relied heavily on evidence-based resources for MRSA screening and isolation, including guidelines from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that address the control and prevention of MRSA and other drug-resistant infections. Bartel urges all perioperative professionals to become familiar with these guidelines and stay abreast of current research and resources, particularly from infection-control experts such as those at APIC and the CDC. AORN supports the use of these infection-control-and-prevention resources, which are developed by infection-control experts working with the world's leading experts in infection prevention and infectious diseases, said Joan Blanchard, RN, MSS, CNOR, CIC, a perioperative nursing specialist in AORN's Center for Nursing Practice. Blanchard serves as AORN's staff liason on infection control and prevention in the perioperative setting. In this role, she works with other experts to develop AORN's recommendations on infection-control practices. She also represents perioperative nursing concerns as a member of several committees that shape regulations, recommendations and guidelines for preventing and controlling infection, including APIC's Scientific Research Council. "There is a general consensus among infectious disease experts and infection control and prevention practitioners that we must realize how dangerous MRSA can be and begin taking an active role in preventing MRSA. Otherwise, this infectious disease may become out of our control and expand further into our communities, putting each of us at risk every day," Blanchard stressed. Preparing for what's ahead The APIC-sponsored survey asked healthcare facilities across the U.S. to report the number of inpatients with MRSA infection or colonization, based on a one day-period between Oct. 1 and Nov. 16, 2006. Overall MRSA prevalence in these facilities was 46.3 per 1,000 inpatients-that's 8 to11 times higher than any previous incidence estimates, according to study findings. "This prevalence study is a watershed report that gives us a glimpse into the reality of MRSA-showing us that prevalence is much higher that anyone thought it was," Blanchard said. "These findings have been a wake-up call for the healthcare profession and have caused those outside the healthcare field to take a closer look at MRSA." Blanchard cited proposals to increase MRSA reporting at both the state and federal level. In December 2007 Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) introduced MRSA infection prevention and patient protection legislation (S. 2525) that, if passed into law, would require hospitals to report the number of cases of HA-MRSA. Other recently proposed federal legislation (H.R. 4451) would support MRSA research and help schools prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant infections acquired in the community (H.R. 4352). With the legislation under consideration and an October 2008 deadline after which the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid will stop reimbursing healthcare facilities for preventable infections, Blanchard and Bartel stress that now is the time to begin implementing programs to prevent the spread of healthcare-acquired MRSA. They agree that the crucial step is for every individual to understand how he or she can help prevent the spread of the disease. "Hand washing remains the best way to prevent infection, and this should be practiced by every healthcare practitioner," Blanchard stressed.
|



