Welcome to the new Outpatient Surgery website! Check out our login FAQs.
Can Sealed Sterilization Containers Lock in Savings?
How to decide if containers or wrapping is best for your facility.
Lucas Higman
Publish Date: September 10, 2019   |  Tags:   Instrument Reprocessing and Care
WORTH THE COST? Kept in good working order, sealed containers will save your facility money over time.

What's the best way to keep your sterilized instruments free of contaminants and protect them from damage during storage and transport? Most of our clients use some combination of disposable blue wrap and reusable sealed containers. Containers cost more, but they feature rigid bottoms that cannot be penetrated, punctured or torn. Here's how to decide if containers make sense for your facility.

1 Is wrap giving you headaches? The impetus for most facilities to buy containers is when tears and holes in wrap are causing them problems. Let your experience be your guide. A surgical set is unsterile if it was reprocessed in a wrap that was punctured. If you're constantly having problems with wraps, containers might be right for you. The cost of containers is one thing, but the impact of having to cancel cases is another, far more important issue to consider. If you're setting up for a case and you don't have the instrument availability you need, especially if it's a unique procedure that requires a one-of-a-kind surgical set, that often leads to costly delays or case postponements.

2 When will you break even? Initial investment in surgical wrap can be cost effective. How do you figure out when you'll start to save money? Start with your annual cost of buying wrap. If it's $20,000, then call the container manufacturers. They'll give you a quote, and you'll have a simple break-even point. You'll save money in the long run, but you'll need to weigh the savings against the short-term investment.

Thankfully, replacement costs aren't part of your equation. I've seen containers at facilities that are 10 to 15 years old and, as long as they're inspected and maintained, there's no reason why they can't continue to be used to keep instruments sterile for years to come. There are, however, maintenance and parts expenses involved and your cost analysis will go awry if you don't consider them. The gasket under the lid of many containers that creates a seal between the lid and container needs to be in good working order. The locking mechanisms need to be tightened or replaced, but not until many years after you purchase the container. If the container has a filter, make sure it doesn't have any holes in it and that the locks that hold it in place are checked. And, of course, there is a cost for the filters themselves, which are replaced after each use. You can get a maintenance plan from the manufacturer or a third party to address these concerns.

3 Space considerations. Containers take up significantly more space than wrapped surgical trays, so a switch would require considering your facility's layout and workflows. Unless you have an extra set of containers, they'll always be in use. The only thing to keep in mind is that you'll need a staging area for the containers as the surgical sets they transport for decontamination, assembly and inspection are being sterilized. Even though it takes less space to store wrap, some facilities may not consistently adhere to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) guidelines. Wrap is often stacked, which leads to creases and punctures that set the unsterilized process into motion.

New to Outpatient Surgery Magazine?
Login or subscribe to continue reading this article