Practical Ways to Implement Safety Devices

Share:

Practical tips from facility managers who've integrated safer sharp devices in their facilities.


If you're like the facility managers who responded to our online sharps- safety survey, you've made some progress implementing safety devices - but you still have a way to go. And you may need to focus more effort on the devices that are highest-risk for sharps injuries: suture needles and scalpel blades.

Even though suture needles are the No. 1 cause of needlestick injuries in ORs, our survey (n=55) found that nearly three-fourths (71 percent) of respondents have not reviewed blunt-tip suture needles - and only 2 percent have fully implemented them. Outpatient Surgery safety columnist Jane Perry, MA, notes that studies have shown that using blunt-tip suture needles could reduce injuries in surgical settings by as much as one-third.

Scalpel blades, the second-leading cause of OR sharps injuries, are another device that needs more focused efforts. More than two-thirds (68 percent) of survey respondents either had not reviewed or reviewed but decided not to implement disposable retracting scalpels. Only 14 percent of them have integrated safety scalpels in their facilities.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health outlines five steps for implementing safety devices:

  • form a sharps-injury prevention team;
  • identify your prevention priorities;
  • identify and screen safer devices;
  • evaluate safer devices; and
  • implement and monitor the devices.

Sounds easy enough but, as is often the case, the devil is in the details. These 10 tips should help you implement safety sharps in your facility.

Preventing More Than Injuries

Along with protecting staff and patients, safety sharps can keep you out of regulatory trouble. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) fined New York's Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) $9,000 for violations of the bloodborne pathogens standard (BPS), according to public records. OSHA cited Montefiore for three "serious" instances of the BPS:

  • not using devices (with 26 specific instances cited)
  • improper handling of reusable sharps; and
  • not providing personal protective equipment.

OSHA deems a violation "serious" when there is a substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from the cited condition and the employer knew, or should have known, of the hazard.

OSHA investigated after several medical residents at the medical center, which is associated with the prestigious Albert Einstein College of Medicine, filed a needlestick-safety complaint.

Although Montefiore has implemented safety devices in some categories and for some procedures, OSHA's citation shows that safety devices weren't being used consistently and across-the-board in all clinical areas. In addition to the lack of safety devices, MMC was also cited for failure to review and update its exposure control plan to reflect evaluation and implementation of safety devices, and for not properly maintaining its sharps injury logs.

Montefiore is contesting the citation. In a statement, the hospital says it has "a long standing and exceptional program to protect its employees from occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens."

- Jane Perry, MA

1. Form a committee
"We have a core panel of users look at a variety of device samples, then select two or three, which are trialed by a select group of staff trials and narrowed down," says Irene Hasenbank, RN, BSN, director of endoscopy services at the Cotton-O'Neill Endoscopy Center in Topeka, Kan.

Her facility's new-products committee includes those from nursing, IV therapy, pharmacy, biomed, health and safety, materials management and surgery. Once the group reviewing new products selects devices, subcommittee members pilot them. Subcommittees, such as the needleless-injection committee, are composed of volunteers - in this case, nurses - who will be working with the safety devices every day.

2. Network with other facilities
When looking to implement new devices, Molly Hicks, RN, chief nursing officer of Surgery Center Southwest in Dallas, Texas, recommends networking with other facilities to see what works, and talking to nurses who have recently attended conferences to find out about new products.

In-house, your nurses and surgeons should be part of device selection, evaluation and review process.

"I solicit comments from those using the devices on daily basis," says Chrissie Stewart, RN, administrator of Cataract Surgical Center of Lubbock in Lubbock, Texas. "How easy are they to use? Are you finding yourself in situations where you or a patient almost got stuck? If so, why? Can you suggest other safety devices we could try?"

3. Facilitate, don't dictate
"The process is a collaboration between those that use the device and me," says Ms. Stewart. "Instead of top-down, it's more of a middle-up process. Many of our nurses work in other facilities, so they may be familiar with safety devices I don't know about. I say, bring me the wrapper, and I'll call the rep. We try them out and see how they compare with the conventional device it's intended to replace." The cost of a device is an important consideration, but ease-of-use is critical. "Even if I have to spend more money up front, if one safety product is more user-friendly than another, I'll buy that one," says Ms. Stewart.

4. Appeal to experience
"The needlestick issue is easy for nurses to identify with," says Ms. Hasenbank. "Many of us have been stuck at least once in our careers. When HIV and hepatitis C became more prevalent, it was easier to get staff to comply."

Appeal to this experience when motivating your staff to make the transition to safety devices, and emphasize that healthcare-worker safety is just as important as patient safety.

5. Training, training, training!
Thorough training (audio-visual aids, articles, hands-on clinical practice and one-on-one teaching) on new devices is key to their successful implementation and acceptance by staff.

If you can, have an infection control expert make a presentation to staff, says Lynda Simon, RN, the nursing administrator at St. John's Clinic: Head and Neck Surgery in Springfield, Mo. "Make sure he discusses the profound changes hepatitis and HIV make on the life of an injured worker and their family," she says.

Don't Reinvent the Wheel

There's no need to spend hours surfing the Web or calling manufacturers to compile a list of safety sharps on the market. The International Health Care Worker Safety Center at the University of Virginia Health System has done it all for you at www.med.virginia.edu/epinet/safetydevice.html. The site covers devices designed to prevent percutaneous injuries and exposures to bloodborne pathogens in healthcare. According to the Web site, the list, updated regularly, is intended to help healthcare facilities in efforts to reduce sharps injuries and comply with OSHA's revised bloodborne pathogens standard.

Also available on the Center's site is the EPINet sharps injury surveillance system (www.med.virginia.edu/epinet), developed by Janine Jagger, MPH, PhD, the Center's director. EPINet provides healthcare facilities with a standardized system for tracking occupational blood exposures and is compliant with OSHA's requirements for a sharps-injury log.

- Stephanie Wasek

6. Win over resistors
Staff buy-in is key to your safety sharps program, so finding something the majority of staff likes is important. But what to do with those who resist change? Try a gradual phase-in strategy or bargaining (use a safety device for every conventional sharp device you use). Some may simply need more training on the device to feel comfortable with it.

7. Don't stock conventional sharps
The logic here is simple: If you don't stock conventional sharps, they can't be used.

Note that OSHA says that safety devices aren't necessary for non-patient purposes, such as drawing up medication with a syringe in a pharmacy. So there may still be limited uses for conventional sharp devices in a few device categories. This, however, will be the exception.

8. Check on patient comfort
Ask your nurses for feedback on how comfortable patients are with the safety devices.

"You can't have something as simple as an IV be extra stressful," says Ms. Simon. "We had one product that caused a lot of drag and pain and pressure on the skin (when starting an IV), so it was immediately deemed unacceptable."

Be sure that patient discomfort isn't due to improper technique or lack of training on the part of a healthcare worker who may need further training on how to use the device correctly.

9. Make it mandatory
Once you have written policies standardizing the use of safety-engineered sharps and safe-sharps practices, enforce it by including compliance in annual reviews. "Everybody knows it's something that's expected," says Ms. Simon.

10. Give manufacturers feedback
You may find that product descriptions in catalogs and online don't clearly state whether devices have safety features, and you may end up with a product you didn't want.

Says Ms. Stewart: "I ordered some devices online that I thought would be compliant but were not. I returned them and complained to my rep and the risk manager [at the company]. The response: As long as there is a demand, we will continue to manufacture and distribute non-compliant device. We have to use our purchasing power to leverage manufacturers and distributors."

Many studies show that safer medical devices, when they are part of an overall bloodborne pathogens risk-reduction program, can be extremely effective in reducing accidental sharps injuries.

"Consistency is the biggest key," says Ms. Stewart. "Don't compromise, regardless of the up-front cost. It will pay off."

How Do You Purchase Safety Devices?

How effective a safety-sharp device is compared to its traditional sharp counterpart is the most influential factor in the buying decision, according to our reader survey (n=55), followed by ease-of-activation of the safety feature and nursing-staff preference.

Here are the top five most influential factors (followed by average rating on a 1-to-11 scale with 1 being the most influential, 11 being the least) on your colleagues' safety-sharps purchasing decisions:

1. Effectiveness compared to traditional sharp device (3.57)
2. Easy-to-activate safety device (4.24)
3. Nursing-staff preference (4.50)
4. Price (5.05) and
5. Surgeon preference (5.30).

The following charts highlight the key findings of our Web-based survey.

What action has your facility taken with these safety injection devices?

?

currently reviewing

implementation in process

fully implemented

reviewed but decided not to implement

have not reviewed

Needle-free jet injectors

4%

10%

23%

10%

54%

Sliding sheath/sleeve needles

10%

13%

40%

25%

12%

Hinged recap needles

6%

4%

31%

29%

31%

Retractable needles

13%

6%

45%

30%

6%

Pre-filled safety syringes

8%

15%

19%

13%

44%

What action has your facility taken with these safety IV-medication delivery system devices?

currently reviewing

implementation in process

fully implemented

reviewed but decided not to implement

have not reviewed

Needleless IV access/ Blunt cannulas

6%

4%

63%

17%

11%

Needleless valve/ Access ports and connectors

6%

11%

76%

7%

0%

Pre-filled medication cartridge with safety needles

6%

11%

25%

11%

47%

Needle guards for pre-filled medication cartridges recessed/protected

10%

0%

17%

13%

60%

Needleless access

7%

4%

35%

17%

37%

What action has your facility taken with these other safety devices or practices?

?

currently reviewing

implementation in process

fully implemented

reviewed but decided not to implement

have not reviewed

Hands-free passing systems

19%

11%

26%

11%

33%

Sharps-disposal systems

6%

4%

74%

2%

15%

Sharps holders/carriers

6%

6%

62%

2%

25%

What action has your facility taken with these safety blood-collection devices?

?

currently reviewing

implementation in process

fully implemented

reviewed but decided not to implement

have not reviewed

Self-blunting phlebotomy needles

7%

2%

9%

13%

70%

Sliding sheath phlebotomy needles

4%

4%

16%

18%

58%

Rectractable phlebotomy needles

7%

2%

22%

17%

52%

Hinged re-cap phlebotomy needles

11%

0%

18%

14%

57%

Sliding sheath steel butterfly needles

2%

2%

19%

13%

64%

Self-blunting steel butterfly needles

5%

0%

5%

14%

77%

Single-use blood tube holder

2%

4%

33%

6%

54%

Plastic blood-collection tubes

9%

7%

23%

2%

59%

Related Articles

Wired for Success

In her 24 years as a nurse at Penn Medicine, Connie Croce has seen the evolution from open to laparoscopic to robotic surgery....

To Optimize OR Design, Put People First

Through my decades of researching, testing and helping implement healthcare design solutions, I’ve learned an important lesson: A human-centered and evidence-based...