A Planning Playbook for Opening a New Orthopedic ASC
The ASC market continues its rapid growth. In 2023, roughly 116 new ASCs opened in the U.S., many of which were orthopedic-specific in nature....
This website uses cookies. to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept & Close”, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
By: Rita McCormick
Published: 10/10/2007
One of our nurses was injured by a sharp during a procedure on an HIV-positive patient about 15 years ago. The injury didn't result in a bloodborne pathogen, but it did raise concern about sharps handling. To put a positive spin on a potentially negative situation, we developed rules for the handling of sharps devices, including their passing in the OR. Here's what we did, and how you can enhance sharps safety in your facility.
Creating a neutral zone
The most highly recommended technique for preventing sharps injuries in the OR is to create a neutral or safe zone for no-hands passing of all sharps. Here's how Outpatient Surgery Safety columnist Mark Davis, MD, FACOG, describes the steps:
To further reduce the potential for injury, says Dr. Davis, keep hands away from the neutral zone.
How we've modified the technique
One drawback to the neutral zone is that it can impede the procession of the case. Some of our surgeons objected to having to take their eyes off the operative site while retrieving the sharp from the neutral zone. To accommodate the physicians, we modified the procedure in the following manner.
If the procedure will require the patient to be in an odd position, such as the lateral position, creating the neutral zone can be a little more difficult. This is another area our flexibility comes in handy. It's perfectly acceptable for the surgical team to make a procedure-time decision about moving the neutral zone or further modifying our current process. But the OR staff must discuss it before the incision is made so that all members of the surgical team are on the same page about the procedure they'll be following throughout the case.
No facility has a best-practice model; sharps safety is always a work in progress. The key is to focus on communication, patient safety and staff safety when deciding what practices you'll use.
A boost for safe practice
Sharps devices manufactured specifically to reduce exposure to blades or needles can supplement safe techniques. Here are some safety sharps to consider for your facility.
Who Wants to Be a Safe Surgeon? |
Everyone knows buy-in is key to making a policy work, but we were surprised by the response from our staff. OR scrub assistants and scrub nurses became very creative with implementation of the policy: Every month, they'd pick a surgeon they felt best exhibited the safe behaviors and named him the safe surgeon of the month. They'd put up a poster dedicated to the new safe surgeon on the first week of each month. Sometimes they'd even write a song about him. Because the surgeons are very competitive, they looked forward to seeing who was the safe doctor of the month. They certainly didn't want to be responsible for anyone's being injured, but this made them really strive. Our chief of surgery at the time was a wonderful man who, though he would never knowingly put a patient or staff member at risk, was never elected the safe doc of the month. But he kept at it, because he thought he should be a role model, and eventually - much to his satisfaction - he was identified. This went on for more than a year, and by then sharps safety had become expected behavior for our surgeons. - Ann White, RN, CSN, and Rita McCormick, RN, CIC |
Behavior reinforcement
Even if you have a good policy in place, you need to also have the courage to follow through. Safe practices are expected in our facility (see "Who Wants to Be a Safe Surgeon?"), but when there is a lapse in behavior, staff are expected to report it to their manager, who'll take it to our professional conduct committee if needed.
The committee is comprised of physicians, including surgeons, who will review the incident from a purely concrete angle: What was the impact on employees, patients and peers?
Preferably, staff will speak up when something negative happens. We've noticed a generational difference here; Baby Boomers have a tendency to wait to report, while Generation X and Y employees often have no problem saying, "That wasn't safe, and I'm not going to tolerate it in this OR." It's also a matter of where you are in the hierarchy; RNs are more willing to speak up than scrub assistants. Sometimes, it's a function of how long you've worked with a given team. If you've developed a good working relationship, you might not want to be adversarial. Other times, it's just a personality thing; some people are more timid than others.
We've empowered everyone to speak up, but we recognize they might want to go about it differently. Having the professional conduct committee has removed some of the potentially adversarial components of pointing out unsafe practices. An important and further-empowering aspect of our policy is that retaliation is a second offense.
A matter of time
It's important to underscore the importance of standardized operative procedures. The OR is extremely intense and fast-paced. If you have everybody expecting to perform safety-related tasks in the same manner, procedures are much more likely to move along quickly - and more safely.
The ASC market continues its rapid growth. In 2023, roughly 116 new ASCs opened in the U.S., many of which were orthopedic-specific in nature....
In her 24 years as a nurse at Penn Medicine, Connie Croce has seen the evolution from open to laparoscopic to robotic surgery....
Through my decades of researching, testing and helping implement healthcare design solutions, I’ve learned an important lesson: A human-centered and evidence-based...