Six Surface Disinfection Concepts
The puzzle of superior surface disinfection is never solved....
This website uses cookies. to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept & Close”, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
By: April Leonard
Published: 10/28/2008
How do you decide which patients get antibiotics before their endoscopic procedures and which do not? Perhaps you consider the patient's risk factors and the procedure she's about to undergo. Or perhaps you've developed your own protocols. Whatever you do, the scientific evidence backing it is probably pretty slim - controlled studies on the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics are rare. To strengthen your footing, I set out to find the most recent indications for administrating antibiotics to endoscopy patients. I pored over journals, committee recommendations, statistics, verdicts and testimony from gastroenterologists from over the past two decades. Here's what I found out.
No Antibiotics Necessary |
The following conditions aren't considered factors that could raise the risk for infection during an endoscopic procedure:
|
Calculated risks
Some physicians prefer a conservative approach to antibiotic prophylaxis, while others are more aggressive. Shifting recommendations make it difficult to maintain a strong protocol. The present consensus is reasonably straightforward regarding the best standard of care for endoscopy patients requiring prophylactic antibiotics.
For the most common procedures performed in an endoscopy suite, such as esophogastroduodenoscopies and colonoscopies, there's a relatively low (4 percent) risk of infection. Most patients won't need antibiotics, but cirrhotic patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding should always receive antibiotic prophylaxis.
In other situations, you'll need to make a case-by-case assessment for patients with one or more high-risk factors. These include:
In contrast, the risk of infection is much higher for esophageal dilation (45 percent) or sclerotherapy (as high as 50 percent). Here, everyone with high-risk factors or cirrhosis should receive antibiotics. Further, you should consider offering prophylaxis to those with a moderate risk factor such as:
Other procedures may also call for more stringent measures based on the odds of developing an infection. For example, the chances of infection from variceal banding is 6 percent, but antibiotics should be given to all high-risk patients and considered for those at low risk due to the variety of infectious culprits. Laser therapy patients may have up to a 34-percent risk of infection, but you should administer antibiotics only to high-risk patients since the only threats come from the normal flora of the patient's skin and mucous membranes.
The ounce of prevention
In each case, the course of treatment is the same: parenteral ampicillin/vancomycin with parenteral gentamycin before the procedure. Add parenteral metronidazole for neutropenic patients. These drugs can prevent endocarditis, symptomatic bacteremia and bacterial colonization in cardiac and non-cardiac prosthetics. Other invasive procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, require an agent such as parenteral levofloxacin. Researchers caution against medicating patients who don't meet criteria for prophylactic antibiotics. Besides the financial burden, unnecessary antibiotic administration can result in allergic drug reactions, drug resistance or antibiotic-related colitis. Keep up with developments; it's clear that more research is needed into what defines high-risk patients.
The puzzle of superior surface disinfection is never solved....
Boston Children’s Hospital is renowned for its exemplary care on many fronts, including surgery....
Manual cleaning done properly is effective for eradicating microorganisms....