Hands-on Protection

Share:

The next time you don gloves before surgery, remind yourself that they're the only barrier between your hands and the patient's skin.


Intact, healthy skin is the best barrier protection we have against microorganisms and the threat of infectious disease. We augment that protection with gloves, but I've seen healthcare providers develop a false sense of security with regard to gloving throughout their careers. Don't take this commonplace practice for granted, since cut, scraped or otherwise compromised skin puts you and patients at risk of exposure to pathogenic organisms and harmful bacteria.

Appropriate use
Supplying the right glove, or gloves, to your staff is a function of surveying their preferences — gloves are not a second skin, but they should feel like one for the sake of practical use — and calculating their cost effectiveness to your budget. In recent years, a third factor has emerged, that of glove composition, as an increasing number of facilities have moved away from the use of latex gloves on account of their potential for allergic reactions, are in the process of doing so or at least make alternatives to them easily available.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings, published in 2007, recommends that healthcare workers "wear gloves with fit and durability appropriate to the task." It's a short statement, but it opens the door to a lot of considerations. Besides highlighting the importance of a well-fitting glove to practical use, and a product's strength to its role as a protective barrier, it also points out that you'll want to match your glove to the job you intend to do and the environment you'll be doing it in. While a non-sterile, nitrile exam glove may serve its purpose for pre-op nurses, for example, your surgical personnel and sterile processing department are going to require a sturdier (and, in the case of OR staff, sterile) product.

Since no two gloves are created equal, spot-check them for holes or flaws before donning them. Random checks of your glove stock may also be helpful in ensuring quality control and guiding future purchases. In its 2007 Recommended Practices on Prevention of Transmissible Infections in the Perioperative Practice Setting, AORN's Recommended Practices Task Force even advises clinicians to routinely double-glove for increased protection during invasive procedures, having upgraded that advice from double-gloving for selected procedures.

How Long Do Gloves Protect You?

The effectiveness of a surgical glove's barrier protection depends directly on its remaining intact. A study examining whether a glove's duration of wear correlates with its risk of perforation suggests that surgeons, first assistants and perioperative nurses participating in a surgical procedure change their gloves after 90 minutes to maintain adequate protection.

For the study, published in the May issue of the journal Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (the study can be reviewed at www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/ 10.1086/597062), researchers at the Medical University of Vienna in Vienna, Austria, collected nearly 900 pairs of used surgical gloves over 9 months of cases at a surgical facility and examined them for microperforations through water testing.

About 15 percent of gloves worn in cases lasting up to 90 minutes showed perforations. In cases lasting 91 to 150 minutes, the microperforation rate rose to 18 percent, and during cases that clocked in at over 150 minutes, the rate was 24 percent. The researchers found no significant differences between perforation rates among surgeons, assistants and nurses, and did not find that the use of hand cream affected gloves' tendencies to perforate. They did note, however, that two-thirds of all perforations occurred on the wearers' non-dominant hands, with one-third of all perforations on the non-dominant index finger.

— David Bernard

In practice
When wearing gloves, keep in mind that while they may have been sterile when you donned them, they do not remain so. According to OSHA, gloves "shall be replaced as soon as practical when contaminated or as soon as feasible if they are torn, punctured, or when their ability to function as a barrier is compromised." The CDC's isolation precaution guidelines add, "Change gloves during patient care if the hands will move from a contaminated body-site (the perineal area, for example) to a clean body-site (the face, for example)."

Also, be aware of your own actions and how they impact your gloves' intended use. Have you ever spied a surgical staffer on the periphery of a procedure scratch an itchy nose? Even if it was just a split second of contact, even if the knuckle or the back of the hand was used instead of the fingertip, the gloves' sterility has been compromised for surgical purposes and should be changed. If they were contaminated, they may also have transmitted organisms to the wearer.

Just as you put on your gloves immediately before they are needed, in order to maintain sterility for the case at hand, you must remove them immediately after their use, at the point of use, to avoid spreading any contamination they may have picked up. It is impossible to know, just by looking at them, whether your hands are clean, and you could be the person who touches the door with a contaminated glove — or the one who touches it next with a bare hand. To reduce the risk of contaminating hands while removing gloves, pull the cuffs up to double over the outside of the glove and enclose the palm and fingers inside.

The hands inside
By no means do gloves replace hand hygiene; they're an adjunct to thorough hand washing and sanitizing. The use of hand scrubs or alcohol-based rubs are key to reducing bioburden on hands before donning gloves to participate in surgery or administer patient care. And hands should be fully dry, too, since damp hands may present difficulties in putting gloves on or contribute to skin irritation if soap residues remain.

It is likewise important to wash your hands immediately after removing gloves, as they may have been contaminated during the gloves' removal. You can't always see the holes that may have developed in the barrier material you're wearing, and contaminants may have wicked inside. And inside a warm, moist environment, whatever bacteria are on a gloved hand will start to grow on it.

If you're noticing contact dermatitis or other compromising conditions on the skin of your hands, wearing gloves is even more important when delivering care, since broken skin can harbor more microorganisms. Make sure you seek a professional skin assessment and choose gloves that don't exacerbate the problem — for instance, if it might be the emergence of a latex allergy. Maintain hand hygiene with lukewarm rather than hot water (which may contribute to the loss of moisture from the skin), pat your hands dry rather than rubbing them and apply a facility-approved lotion that isn't heavily perfumed and won't break down gloves.

Increased Risks, Better Gloves

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Universal Precautions for Prevention of Transmission of HIV and Other Bloodborne Infections (released in 1987 and updated in 1996 as "Standard Precautions") was a landmark standard in recommending the routine use of personal protective equipment, including masks, protective eyewear and gloves, as barriers between the skin and mucous membranes of healthcare workers and the potentially infectious fluids of patients.

According to the precautions, "gloves should be worn:

  • for touching blood and body fluids requiring universal precautions, mucous membranes, or nonintact skin of all patients, and
  • for handling items or surfaces soiled with blood or body fluids to which universal precautions apply."

Surgical gloves were in use well before the publication of the CDC's precautions. But the potential hazards raised by the identification of bloodborne pathogens in the early 1980s increased awareness of the importance of gloving in clinical environments and fostered a boom in glove use throughout the healthcare profession, not just among OR staffs.

This climate also led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the American Society for Testing and Materials to strengthen their regulations and specifications on the manufacturing and marketing of surgical gloves, which undergo rigorous testing before they meet approval. Incidentally, the end result of this oversight was a smaller pool of glove manufacturers producing higher-quality gloves.

— Jacqueline Daley, HBSc, MLT, CIC, CSPDS

Related Articles