Mark the Site Right

Share:

How do your site-marking protocols compare to the more than 500 surgical facilities we surveyed?


If the Joint Commission's estimate of 40 wrong-site surgeries occurring each week is to be believed, plenty of surgeons are operating on the wrong site or side, what one facility leader called the "scariest scenario" for an OR staff. Wrong-site surgery is easily prevented, say the 560 surgical leaders who responded to our online survey (see "Site-Marking Practices Revealed" on page 30), as long as you focus on these 3 keys to site-marking success.

Patient participation
The Joint Commission's Universal Protocol says patients should be involved in the site-verification process whenever possible, and nearly all of our survey respondents (98%) involve patients in their site-marking practices. Only about one-fourth of respondents use accessories such as adhesive stickers or temporary tattoos, which the Joint Commission says cannot be the sole means of marking a surgical site, to supplement their primary marks.

When patients are brought to the pre-op area of the Ardmore (Okla.) Regional Surgery Center, they're asked to state their full name, date of birth and the procedure that's about to be performed. Pre-op nurses then have them note "yes" next to the correct surgical site before surgeons sign their initials next to the patients' marks, says Tara Flanagan, RN, the center's clinical director.

Make site-marking part of the pre-operative conversation before the patient arrives on the day of surgery to ensure you have the proper side noted on the physicians' orders, says Stuart Katz, MBA, FACHE, CASC, director of the Tucson Orthopaedic Outpatient Surgery Center in Arizona. Then, when the patient is being admitted, have them or their responsible escort mark the site, he adds.

"Patients might think we're going overboard," says Linda Vossler, RN, CNOR, referring to the multiple times they're asked to state their name and the procedure they're about to undergo. "But with the 3 or 4 checkpoints patients must go through before an incision is made," says the director of surgical services at Bert Fish Medical Center in New Smyrna Beach, Fla., "I'm confident someone will catch a mistake along the way."

Ms. Vossler agrees that patient involvement is integral to site-marking success, and advises you make patients active participants in the process. "Don't ask "yes' or "no' questions," she says, warning that some patients, particularly the elderly, might agree with leading questions from your pre-op nurses. "Make them tell you which procedure they're having, including the location."

Surgeon buy-in
Whenever possible, the physician performing the procedure should mark the surgical site, according to the Universal Protocol. In limited circumstances, the guideline states, site marking can be delegated to medical residents, physician assistants or advanced practice registered nurses, but the operating physician is ultimately responsible for ensuring the mark is correct and present. For that reason, most responders (80%) to our survey demand that surgeons mark sites in pre-op before patients are moved to the OR. No mark? No movement.

When site-marking initiatives began to gain steam several years ago, efficient-minded surgeons at Ardmore Regional Surgery Center weren't completely on board with leaving the OR to mark sites on patients in pre-op holding bays — until their pushback began to delay the start of their cases. "The first few times, we had to delay surgery and physically go get them to sign sites," says Ms. Flanagan. "When it cuts into their surgery time, they'll get on board with your initiatives." Plus, she says, it takes only a minute or two to properly confirm and sign the correct site (see "A Sign for Site Markings").

Rachel Hall, RN, points out that keeping your schedule on track and having patients prepped and ready for marking is a key component of correct site identification. Make sure patients arrive in plenty of time for their surgeries so you can get the consent signed, IV started and everything settled with the admission process, suggests Ms. Hall. "This gives the patient time to ask any last-minute questions, and it keeps our docs from having to hurry through the final pre-op assessment and marking process," says the director of the Surgery Center of Middle Tennessee in Columbia.

SMUDGED INITIALS: When Preps Fade Site Markings

Do your skin preps smudge your site markings? Chlorhexidine-based skin preps result in significantly greater erasure of surgical site markings than iodine-based solutions do, says a study in the January 2012 issue of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Researchers used a black permanent marker to mark 20 total hip arthroplasty patients with surgeons' initials and a random combination of 3 letters underlined by a single black line. Surgeons were 22 times more likely to judge markings as "acceptable" following application of the iodine-based solutions. They correctly identified 296 of 300 letters on patients prepared with the iodine-based solution compared to 209 of 300 letters on patients prepared with the chlorhexidine-based preps.

In an accompanying editorial, John Lawrence Marsh, MD, professor of orthopaedics and rehabilitation at the University of Iowa College of Medicine, wonders how readable the surgical marking has to be. The JBJS study did not say the marking was not visible, but only that it was "less clear" after the chlorhexidine-based solution was applied, he points out.

"The signed site does not need to convey any substantial information," says Dr. Marsh. "To do its job, the mark only needs to be visible — not crisp, clear or perfectly defined." Dr. March says detailed time outs and safety checklists might be just as important in preventing wrong-site surgery as legible site markings.

As the Universal Protocol states, site markings must be sufficiently permanent to be visible after skin preparation. However, nearly half of the respondents to Outpatient Surgery Magazine's site-marking survey say markings become less visible after skin prep solution is applied around the planned incision site. Chlorhexidine- and iodine-based solutions were equally to blame, according to our reader survey.

"It's important to see the mark during pre-procedure time outs for consistency's sake," says Kelli Warden, BSN, RN, CNOR, the director of surgical services at Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center in Cambridge.

Here's a tip to keep markings visible: Clean the patient's skin with alcohol before marking and let the mark dry sufficiently before applying prepping solution, says Mary Wilson, RN, BSN, CNOR. Should the mark fade, surgeons can always re-mark the site in the OR before the pre-procedure time out, says the clinical nurse preceptor and educator of the West Virginia University Hospitals in Morgantown, W.Va. Ms. Wilson also suggests using surgical site markers with ink formulations designed to remain intact after prepping. Most surgeons aren't particularly picky about the markers they use to verify sites, she says.

— Daniel Cook

Clear markings
Unambiguous and consistent site markings must be made at or near the procedure site, according to the Universal Protocol. The marks should also be visible after skin preparation and draping, the guideline states.

A little more than half (55%) of the survey's respondents say surgeons use their initials to identify the surgical site. Others say they mark "yes" (16%) or draw a dotted line (4%) along the intended incision site, both acceptable options according to the Universal Protocol's mandate for clear and concise markings. However, 6% of the respondents say they mark an "X" at the correct site, an ambiguous mark that surgical staff members could mistaken for a warning to not operate where they should. Many respondents say a surgeon's signature or initials are the final check of a multi-step confirmation process that includes notations made by pre-op nurses and patients.

But what if the site is anatomically and technically difficult to mark, as in urologic, gynecologic, spine, laparoscopic and eye procedures? "This topic gets lots of attention, especially when talking about marking spinal levels, internal organs, mucous membranes or procedures done through a scope," says Mary Kline, BSN, manager of the Park Nicollet Ambulatory Surgery in St. Louis Park, Minn.

When faced with sites that can't be marked, rely on patient armbands that contain the information needed to perform a successful pre-procedure time out: the patient's name, the scheduled procedure and the name of the physician performing the procedure. The physician performing the procedure initials the armband to confirm its accuracy, says Pam Kershner, RN, BS, CNOR, perioperative business manager at Schneck Medical Center in Seymour, Ind.

Time to focus
Your surgical team needs to concentrate on marking the correct site before each and every procedure, even in the face of constant time crunches, says Kelli Warden, BSN, RN, CNOR. How long do cases last? How fast can rooms be turned over? When will patients be ready for discharge? "Surgery is measured in minutes," adds the director of surgical services at Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center in Cambridge. "Staff feels the strain of getting things done as quickly as possible, and sometimes that causes them to lose track of the safety tools they're supposed to use. And that's when wrong-site Swiss cheese occurs — the holes all line up and something bad happens."

IDEA THAT WORKS: A Sign for Site Markings

Make site marking as convenient as possible for surgeons to promote compliance with your facility's wrong-site surgery prevention policies, says Kelli Warden, BSN, RN, CNOR, the director of surgical services at Southeastern Ohio Regional Medical Center in Cambridge. Her pre-op nurses place a laminated sign that reads "Not Marked" next to a marker on the blankets of patients who haven't yet had their surgical sites identified. The signs serve as visual reminders to surgeons and the markers are placed for convenience. "The surgeons walk up, grab the marker and mark the site," says Ms. Warden. "They're not standing around, looking for needed supplies. The set-up really makes the whole site-marking process go smoother." Once sites have been marked, nurses drop the signs into a nearby storage bin until they're needed again.

— Daniel Cook

Related Articles