Put Pressure Injuries in the Rearview

Share:

How two busy facilities built a culture of awareness and prevention.


There’s no shortage of compelling data and research on exactly what it takes to prevent pressure injuries. The trick is finding practical ways to put that evidence into the day-to-day workflow of your busy facility. To that end, we spoke with two facilities that spearheaded successful pressure injury prevention projects to find how to do just that.

Proactive approach

After seeing reduced inpatient pressure injuries with standardized use of prophylactic foam dressings at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, Perioperative Clinical Nurse Specialist Kizzie Charles, MS, APRN, AGCNS-BC, CNOR, formed a multidisciplinary team of nurses and physicians to build a protocol for the OR — with the help of Wound Ostomy Clinical Nurse Specialist Beatrice Forlizzi, MSN, RN, CWOCN, and Perioperative Director Yessenia V. Salgado, MS, BSN, RN, NE-BC, CNOR. The protocol focused on assessing the patient’s health as a whole, examining their medications, comorbidities, the upcoming procedure and — most importantly — the current health of their skin before and after surgery to document concerns for all team members to be aware of. It required new approaches for risk and skin assessments, and prophylactic dressing applications that were standardized and could also be continually adapted after implementation.

To make it happen, the Sloan Kettering team determined a new risk assessment specific to surgery was needed to provide a structure that identifies patients at risk for OR-acquired pressure injuries. They looked at several established pressure injury assessments specific to the perioperative setting and reviewed each element as a team to determine feasibility and relevance. “We wanted to keep the process streamlined and easy to apply, while capturing critical risk data specific to our patient population,” says Ms. Charles.

The team focused on inpatients and same-day admission patients who have a BMI less than 19, and surgery length greater than four hours. These elements were then standardized in electronic documentation and shared with all staff through comprehensive education on why each element of the risk assessment was important. The team notes the importance of padding based on individual patient needs, such as bony prominences or an existing skin injury identified in preoperative care that could be more prone to a pressure injury.

To identify patients at risk for pressure injuries, the team created a daily report, which is autogenerated and emailed to leadership and the charge nurse, flagging the patient record for the intraoperative staff. The circulating nurse is notified if the patient meets criteria for the application of protective dressings.

The correct application of foam dressings, which is part of the program’s comprehensive education, is reinforced by posting anatomical charts in the OR for prophylactic dressing placement. Ms. Charles says the charts were designed in collaboration with the dressings’ manufacturer to create a visual aid of common surgical positions. “These large, laminated posters show exactly where the minimum number of dressings should be placed and color-code the highest risk areas such as the sacrum, so teams can easily plan for and grab the appropriate dressings, in addition to extra dressings they deem necessary,” she says.

While the goal is to standardize all aspects of pressure injury prevention, the Sloan Kettering team stresses the value of being nimble. Though the team planned to have OR nurses apply foam dressings in the pre-op area, it added extra time to the surgical schedule and created more work, with additional padding needing to be applied in the OR, says Ms. Charles. “We then moved the application of dressings to the intraoperative phase and worked closely with our OR nurses to find the opportunities for dressing application that wouldn’t delay the surgery,” she adds.

For instance, most patients walk into the OR themselves, providing an opportunity for the nurse to place the sacrum padding before the patient is even positioned on the surgical table. Heel padding is also placed when the nurse is applying compression cuffs to complete two steps in concert, all while other staff members are completing different tasks prior to surgery.

Our entire culture regarding skin assessment has collectively moved from retrospective analysis to proactive prevention.
—Beatrice Forlizzi, MSN, RN, CWOCN

Critical thinking also comes into play for any team member assessing the patient’s skin before or after the surgery, a process that is supported through electronic documentation. “Any skin redness or areas of concern aren’t a surprise after surgery because our PACU nurses see the foam dressing in place and read the documentation, which is reiterated in the hand-off and can even be used as rationale to initiate a postoperative wound care consultation,” says Ms. Forlizzi. “Our entire culture regarding skin assessment has collectively moved from retrospective analysis of injuries to proactive prevention.”

3 Keys to Effective Skin Assessments
NEW GUIDELINES

AORN’s new Guideline for Pressure Injury Prevention includes a recommendation to use a structured risk assessment tool that has been validated or demonstrated as reliable for perioperative patients. Cassendra Munro, PhD, RN, RNFA, CNOR, creator of the Munro Pressure Risk Assessment Scale mentioned in the new guideline, says these three steps are paramount to successfully implementing a perioperative-focused pressure-injury risk assessment:

Make it multidisciplinary. Collaboration is essential and the most effective change in practice comes through a team approach that includes key stakeholders. Invite nurses from each phase of care, as well as surgeons and anesthesia providers, to share their input. Remember that pressure injury risk assessment is a process, not a single event.

Pilot the program. Implementation brings an opportunity to practice, so rehearse the steps before rolling out the risk assessment with all perioperative patients. Start with one patient to ensure questions have been answered for the process steps. And remember to educate and communicate to the next phase of care, including the inpatient unit, because prevention does not stop when the procedure ends.

Measure the change. Performance of a new risk assessment consistently reveals gaps in knowledge, so leverage the opportunity to measure pre- and post-understanding and celebrate learning along the way. An important part of educating team members about pressure injury risk assessment is emphasizing the goal to improve safety and quality of care — and to align with evidence-based practices like those in AORN guidelines. Risk assessment is an essential component of pressure injury prevention. 

Carina Stanton

Skin assessment algorithm

SENSITIVE AREAS When positioning surgical patients, remind staff to always be vigilant about padding sensitive areas such as the heels.

Amity Herrera, BSN, RN, CNOR, WFR, leads an ongoing pressure injury prevention project focused on improving skin assessment with an algorithm she and her team created at the University of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Medical Center at Parnassus Heights. The team decided to emphasize the importance of documenting blanching erythema because it’s a high indicator of pressure injury risk. “We saw the need for a visual tool to reinforce the most important skin assessment steps an OR staff member can take to flag the earliest risks and signs of a pressure injury,” says Ms. Herrera.

To start, the team conducted a survey that identified several crucial gaps in knowledge, with one issue standing out. “We saw how these knowledge gaps were translating into inconsistent hand-off communications to postoperative staff, an area where intervention is so critical to catch the earliest signs of pressure injury,” says Ms. Herrera. To increase skin assessment competence and confidence, the team created a Skin Assessment Algorithm with easy-to-read visual explanations based on their intraoperative electronic medical record skin documentation form. “We broke down the elements of the skin documentation terminology to help staff improve their categorization of skin conditions that fell outside of the “normal limits” category. This created better and more precise documentation to also aid in data analysis,” says Ms. Herrera.

The Skin Assessment Algorithm outlines how to assess a patient for blanching erythema with step-by-step visuals on how to gently press on reddened areas to check for blanching and how to use the back of the hand to assess skin temperature. “We emphasize that these pressure injury risk areas are most commonly found on bony prominences or areas of the body that made direct contact with positioning surfaces during the procedure,” says Ms. Herrera.

Regular emails are sent to staff containing the Skin Assessment Algorithm and other reminders on pressure injury prevention. “With so many competing demands, it’s important to keep pressure injury prevention practices fresh in the minds of team members,” says Ms. Herrera.

Ms. Herrera and her team track blanching erythema values and postoperative pressure injury data to assess the efficacy of their prevention measures and make changes when needed. Through post-education follow-up surveys on how the Skin Assessment Algorithm helped staff, the team found their competence and confidence in pressure injury prevention jumped from 50% to 81.25%, and staff understanding of the importance of documenting blanching erythema increased to 93.75%. Ms. Herrera is also tracking a steady increase in documented incidents of blanching erythema, which she likes to see because “this means more potential pressure injuries are being caught as early as possible.” OSM

Related Articles