All Articles

August 17, 2023

THIS WEEK'S ARTICLES

Behind the Scenes of an Instrument Reduction Project

Study Highlights Major Benefits of Tray Optimization Model in SPD

It Takes Teamwork to Be Successful in the Competitive ASC World - Sponsored Content

Cutting Costs Via Smaller Instrument Trays

Visible Contaminants on Sterilized Trays Led to Staff Petition

 

Behind the Scenes of an Instrument Reduction Project

At Virtua Health, even the skeptics and the worriers came around to the idea.

InstrumentsNorthwell Health
UNNECESSARY EFFORT Every day, your busy sterile processing techs could be reprocessing numerous instruments that weren’t actually used in your ORs.

The shared governance team at Virtua Health in Voorhees, N.J., identified a big opportunity to improve efficiency and reduce costs by streamlining surgical instrument sets. It observed too many trays containing rarely used instrumentation, and decided its most commonly used instrument sets could benefit from a well-considered pruning.

"Our staff had a big push to try and make our whole department a little bit more efficient and just make our workday a little bit easier," says shared governance team member and staff nurse David Meyer, BSN, RN, CNOR. "We started about three years ago by reorganizing our core, moving supplies we most often use closest to where we use them, not to where they just happened to be 10 years ago and that's just where they were. That really changed the mindset of the department, and we then looked at our workflows to see if we could reduce the time patients spent in the OR to save money.

"Then we started to really look at our instruments: ‘Do we really need all of these retractors? Why do we still have these forceps that a doctor who long since retired used? Let's pull them out of our sets because we don't use them for most surgeries anymore, and we can have them available.’ That way, it's easier setup, less for sterile processing to reprocess every time, less wear and tear on the instruments so we don't need to replace them as much."

The team created a list of its instrument sets, and over five months collaborated with surgeons of various specialties to break them down and collectively determine which instruments in various trays were unnecessary. "We asked, ‘Do you really need all of this, or that?’" says Mr. Meyer. "Most of the time, if there were, say, 12 of a certain instrument, they’d say ‘I'm okay only using eight.’"

After this worthwhile exercise, the team worked with central sterile supply to create new instrument sets, which were trialed by all surgical staff and discussed at staff meetings over another two months. Both staff and surgeons were empowered to provide feedback and make suggestions.

The team ended up reducing instrument counts in its general laparoscopic, abdominal open surgery and minor vaginal trays, as well as several breast trays. Now, for example, most general laparoscopic surgeries require only one instrument tray as opposed to two.

Importantly for the success of the project, all of the removed instruments are now sterilized and stored separately, always available for quick retrieval when needed. Mr. Meyer says this was the biggest obstacle his team encountered: changing the "just in case" mindset of staff and surgeons.

"We needed them to move out of their comfort zone and realize this is going to be easier," he says. "What surprised us was how quickly the people who were hesitant accepted it, like some of our more veteran nurses who’d always done things a certain way. Some surgeons were hesitant: ‘Make sure I have all of my instruments, make sure I have all of my special retractors.’

"We explained that you're still going to have them right here in the room, they’re just not going to be open on the field. You may have to wait an extra 15 or 20 seconds. It's wrapped, it's sterile, it's just not opened, and when you need it, it's right here."

The result of the project, says the team, is a system that is more effective for Virtua patients, staff and surgeons alike. Resulting cost savings are well into five figures, says Mr. Meyer, due to reduced reprocessing and instrument replacements, along with quicker setups and breakdowns in the OR and less staff fatigue.

Study Highlights Major Benefits of Tray Optimization Model in SPD

Even the smallest reduction in unused, unnecessary instruments can have a major impact.

OptimizeNorthwell Health
OPTIMIZED WORKLOAD Reprocessing techs who deal with large amounts of instrumentation will benefit from the removal of rarely used instruments from their daily queue.

If you’re looking to reduce the workload of your sterile processing staff and boost the overall efficiency of their department, tray optimization management (TOM) is the way to go.

That’s one of the key findings in an ambitious, multifaceted research paper recently published in the journal Systems Engineering. Researchers developed a series of OR block assignment models in an effort to reduce sterile processing workload, resulting in a TOM that pared down the number of instruments on what had become increasingly, unnecessarily bloated trays.

Of particular interest to facility leaders is what the report said about the TOM model it developed: "Efficient instrument trays decrease the number of unused instruments that [reprocessing staff] sterilize. This decrease in workload would affect the rinsing and assembly stations in the sterile processing department. Thus, we conducted a systematic testing plan in which all the rinsing and assembly processing times were decreased by 5% to 20%."

In fact, the report noted that even a mere 5% reduction in processing times significantly improved all nine metrics it tracked: average rinse station time, average assembly station time, average case turnaround time, average rinse wait time for those who wait, average number who wait for assembly, average number who wait for rinse, average number who do not wait for assembly and average number who do not wait for rinse.

While the findings in this report certainly support the benefits of "right-sizing" instrument counts and instrument trays as much as possible, this is only one aspect of superior sterile processing departments. The most efficient reprocessing areas are generally the most well-rounded, characterized by trained and certified staff, strong leadership, standardized processes and proven ancillary technology. This study provides yet more evidence that a solid tray optimization management process also belongs on that list.

It Takes Teamwork to Be Successful in the Competitive ASC World
Sponsored Content

OR teams work collaboratively with consultants to develop the most efficient surgical workflow and reprocessing strategies for their facilities.

One TrayONE TRAY® Dr. Marchand standing next to his solution with the use of ONE TRAY® and EZ-TRAX.

It takes a team working together to prepare an ambulatory surgery center for a successful business as well as the safe surgical journey for all of the patients it serves. The OR leaders, surgeons and staff need to collaborate in concert with vendor partners and consultants to define, improve and implement a workflow that provides optimal efficiency and safety. That takes communication, experience and cooperation.

In fact, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) who provide a menu of surgical procedures, especially those requiring multiple instrumentation such as orthopedics, need reliable consultants who can help ensure that the sterilization process is taken care of in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible. Flexibility and efficiency will provide a safe and consistent process that allows cases to be scheduled and no time lost because of scheduling and equipment challenges.

A key element to this efficiency is reprocessing the necessary equipment and it is critical to the pre-op, intra-op and post-op journey of each and every patient. Consultants who work closely with surgeons and tech staff can offer practical solutions for getting the equipment there on time, every time. The equipment used to bolster this process is critical to avoid cancelled cases and lost business.

ONE TRAY® has transformed the approach to sterilization for ambulatory centers by providing a Total Solution that saves time, money and the daily headaches due to torn wraps, wet packs and cancelled/delayed cases. This solution allows facilities to meet demands head on by processing instrumentation in a fraction of the time it takes sterile wrap or other rigid containers.

How is this done? ONE TRAY® partners with EZ-TRAX and maximizes the reprocessing of orthopedic sets with the ability to take 6 to 8 trays down to approximately 2 to 3 – and since space is always at a premium in the ASC, this is particularly helpful. This solution can save approximately 3 hours in reprocessing per case (based on your sterilizer), and the result is an approximate 60%-75% reduction in cost and labor to process surgical instrumentation. The use of this solution has given surgeons more flexibility and the ability to do more cases per day in less time and with less trays.

Consultants work with the clinical staff and support a variety of staff members ranging from the Sterile Processing Department (SPD), operating room staff, infection control personnel, surgeons and more for an efficient transition and follow up support. If you work with ONE TRAY®, they provide a staff of educators and clinical support to assist with implementation, training or to answer any questions about the use of the Total Solution system.

Dr. Robert Marchand, Orthopedic Surgeon, presented his 5 phase approach to how he transformed his facility by incorporating ONE TRAY® and EZ-TRAX into his surgery workflow. His presentation is titled "Surgical Tray Optimization and Efficiency: The Impact of Novel Sealed Sterile Container Technology and you can watch that video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRbR2wje-0E&t=79s

Note: For more information go to onetray.com/products.

Please follow the product IFU’s for use.

Condoc 501

Cutting Costs Via Smaller Instrument Trays

Microsavings at this facility added up to five figures over one year.

Removing unnecessary instruments from surgical trays used during one hospital’s breast surgery cases for an entire year saved the facility nearly $20,000.

The optimization strategy by the institution was implemented as a money-saving measure to combat rising costs, according to the study by Medical College of Wisconsin researchers published in Journal of Surgical Research. New operating room efficiencies are especially important to explore, they write, because running ORs represents about 60% of a hospital’s total operational costs.

The project involved 10 trays used by breast surgeons for lumpectomies and mastectomies. Each tray had 82 instruments and was reduced to 65. The 17 instruments that were removed were readily available via peel packs at a surgeon’s request.

The trays were used a total of 656 times throughout the year, with a cost of $1.69 to reprocess each instrument after each use. The instruments were also sent out for maintenance after their tray was sterilized 30 times (typically twice in a year) at a cost of $2 per instrument. The team calculated that having fewer instruments in each tray ultimately resulted in $18,847 in reprocessing savings and $680 less in maintenance bills.

The leaders of the initiative concluded that other surgical departments could achieve similar cost reductions by eliminating the wasteful practice of having rarely used instruments in their trays. They wrote that optimizing trays saves money without sacrificing patient care and can be part of a lean principle OR bundle that includes other cost-saving components such as shaving minutes off room turnovers.

"Removing underutilized surgical instruments from instrument trays used for breast surgeries performed at a single high-volume institution resulted in significant annual cost savings," they wrote. "Our data supports recent literature demonstrating that eliminating unnecessary instruments is an easily replicable process that provides both financial and time savings."

Visible Contaminants on Sterilized Trays Led to Staff Petition

Employees called for halt to surgeries, while their health system said the issue was being addressed and the trays were safe.

A petition signed by more than 70 employees at San Diego’s Kaiser Permanente Zion Medical Center in June called for the pause of all surgeries at the facility due to what they said was visible contamination on surgical instrument trays.

Staff painted a grim picture of the situation in a story reported by The San Diego Union-Tribune. "There are black/gray/brown particles of an unknown substance dusting the interiors of our surgical trays, in addition to black greasy smears of a known but not surgically approved substance," said Zion surgical technician Elizabeth Haynes. She said management told workers that sterilization renders the particles they found "inert and non-microbial," meaning they present no danger of causing an infection during a procedure. Ms. Haynes rejected that reasoning, stating that "the fact that a contaminant is ‘safe’ (not a microbe) doesn’t mean that contaminant is implantable."

Kaiser rejected calls for a surgical shutdown. "Providing safe, quality and timely care to our patients is our top priority and we will continue to schedule surgeries at Zion that can be safely performed," it said. "We have confirmed that all measures we are taking to clean, process and transport surgical equipment to our Zion Medical Center for use is safe and medically appropriate."

However, Kaiser confirmed that it adjusted its sterilization operations after it detected an "isolated issue" at Zion in mid-May with equipment used to wash surgical instruments before sterilization that it said caused "minute residual particles" from a hot water tank to appear. "We are currently cleaning and flushing the lines of this equipment to remove all residual particulates," said Kaiser in June. "In the meantime, surgical instruments used at Zion Medical Center are being safely cleaned and processed at our nearby San Diego Medical Center and an outside agency."

There has been no additional reporting on the situation. However, this incident provides another example of the importance of open collaboration and communication between the OR and sterile processing, and the confusion that can result when that dynamic doesn’t exist. OSM