June 21, 2023

Share:

THIS WEEK'S ARTICLES

Can AI Improve Your Communications With Patients?

An Inside Look at a High-Volume GI Facility

Learn How Technology Can Help Reduce Challenges in the GI Space - Sponsored Content

How’s the Air in There?

Left Lateral Decubitus Patient Position Less Harmful to Endoscopists

 

Can AI Improve Your Communications With Patients?

One GI group is finding out in real-time.

AIOhio Gastroenterology Group
AT YOUR SERVICE Ohio Gastroenterology Group is leveraging artificial intelligence to improve and enhance communications with patients while freeing human staff to have more meaningful interactions in person and over the phone.

When Ohio Gastroenterology Group, a Columbus-based physician-owned practice with five endoscopy centers, was drowning in tens of thousands of monthly phone calls after the pandemic, its leaders turned to artificial intelligence (AI) for help.

“It was impossible to have enough people to answer every call in a timely manner,” says gastroenterologist and board member Raghuram Reddy, MD. “Lots of voicemails means upset patients, so we had to find solutions.”

Forward-thinking practices over the last decade have gradually implemented text messaging, email and smartphone apps for patient communication, while providing richer information on their websites. Some offer web-based portals through which patients can securely access personal records, providers and other information. Ohio Gastroenterology wants to avoid the weaknesses of these approaches that still frustrate some patients by taking it even further — to provide something more seamless, personalized and easier to use for both the practice and the patient.

It’s doing this via a highly configurable, private and secure patient communications platform that enables providers to develop and implement “smart virtual assistants” powered by conversational AI via web, text and voice. The platform automates communication workflows that humans such as overburdened doctors, nurses and staff previously needed to perform. Dr. Reddy says the platform furthers his vision of providing “directed self-service” to patients.

Last year, Ohio Gastroenterology launched the platform by providing self-serve access to COVID-19 information, insurance coverage and billing processes. To support intake workflows, it later launched automated outreach programs in which interactive virtual assistants deliver pre-op instructions and post-op check-ins. This year, it will implement referral scheduling functionality that enables patients to book recommended appointments digitally.

The practice anticipates self-scheduling will reduce leakage and capture revenue from patients who otherwise might not have scheduled. Still to come is a visual patient assessment tool whose range of images will allow patients to share detailed information about where they are experiencing pain.

Dr. Reddy says Ohio Gastro is simply catching up with how patients interact with almost everything else in life by being available virtually 24/7/365. “You can fly all around the world without talking to anyone, but in most cases, you cannot schedule a colonoscopy or endoscopy without speaking with a human,” he says. The intent is not to eliminate human interactions, but to optimize them. If a patient would prefer to speak to a live human being, that option is always available.

The practice and the platform’s vendor continuously monitor the system to ensure patient satisfaction. “The statistics it generates will tell us if people are getting frustrated, so we’ll know if we need to make changes,” says Dr. Reddy. But it does require significant work on his end to maximize the platform’s capabilities and achieve his vision of directed self-service.

“I want my patients to hear what I think is appropriate, as opposed to whatever is out there on Google,” he says. “All of this takes some intelligence in the background. We made a bank of hundreds of questions where patients can chat and interact with the AI with answers vetted and curated by us, so I know they get the right answers. We provide all the clinical content; the intelligence happens in the background.”

Dr. Reddy estimates the system’s automation of routine workflows can save 45 minutes per provider per day, allowing the practice to see more patients and potentially realize a seven-figure increase in annual revenue.

An Inside Look at a High-Volume GI Facility

Answers to three key questions on how to keep your center humming.

GreenwoodGreenwood Endoscopy Center
ON TOP OF IT At Greenwood Endoscopy Center, a dedicated staffer helps control costs by monitoring supply levels, which improves the efficiency of its reordering processes.

Greenwood (S.C.) Endoscopy Center is a relatively small facility that nevertheless performs around 9,500 cases each year. When we asked its director of nursing, Laura Young, RN, what it takes to maintain that level of volume, she pulled back the curtain to reveal the little things her center does to succeed. In the process, she offered surgical leaders several best practices they could try at their facilities.

OSM: What’s a simple process change that has paid off big for you?

Laura Young (LY): We’ve expanded our schedule to allow more patient visits. Extending the schedule enables more patients to come in later in the day at their convenience. Our cases are scheduled every 15 minutes, so adjusting the schedule allowed us to add four patients per room. Four patients per room may not sound like a lot, but it adds up. In fact, those four procedures per room add up to 3,000 more cases for the center each year.

OSM: What cost-cutting initiatives can work for a GI center?

LY: Cost control is crucial for any GI center, and opportunities to shave off a little here or there always present themselves to facility leaders who are willing to put in the effort. One endoscopy center I know cut down on costs related to medical waste that added up to an extra $800 monthly. The director simply audited what employees and doctors were tossing into medical waste bags and found plenty of materials that didn’t belong there, such as cups and gloves. She then re-educated staff on what was supposed to be in the waste, and that ended up saving the GI center quite a bit of money in the long run.

We’ve enacted a few strategies of our own here. For instance, we have a dedicated employee who’s in charge of managing supplies. She keeps our supply room incredibly organized so we can see what’s getting low, as well as what we have too much of so we can back off in terms of ordering those items. We also work closely with our sales reps to determine if and when we should change products. While the products we purchase don’t change, different vendors could certainly offer more attractive prices.

OSM: Staffing is a challenge for virtually every surgery center. How do you ensure cases aren’t cancelled due to lack of staff?

LY: We have our base staff, but we also have PRN staff to call if anyone is out sick, on maternity leave, or unavailable for whatever reason. Having a dependable pool of backups is a must for any high-volume ASC. It ensures you’re never in a situation where you’re forced to close a procedure room simply because you don’t have enough nurses or techs.

Fortunately, we’ve never had too much trouble recruiting nurses and techs. We use Indeed, social media and local newspapers as our primary recruiting channels, with varying results. Social media has worked exceptionally well because we can put a job ad post up and if someone shares it, the reach could be limitless.

 

Learn How Technology Can Help Reduce Challenges in the GI Space
Sponsored Content

Preventing accidents in GI surgeries impacts costs, patient satisfaction and employee safety.

NeptuneStryker

Under the current standard of GI care, polyps can be lost, canisters might need to be changed mid-procedure, and staff are more likely to be exposed to hazardous materials. It goes without saying – the GI space has its challenges. However, technology exists to help address those challenges.

Connie Hall, RN, is a certified gastroenterology nurse at a busy facility that has adopted a constantly closed waste management system.1 Not only did canisters have to be changed during a procedure – occasionally two to three times – but a lost polyp meant manually searching through the waste.

“The way you had to go through canisters to find a missing polyp, now that’s a day you don’t want to repeat very often,” Hall recalls. The facility she works at performs hundreds of colonoscopies per month. Therefore, a switch to a closed waste management system could potentially make a huge impact on time as well as accidental spills.

For most of her career, Hall worked with wall suction canisters but knew there had to be a better way to dispose of GI waste. She was on the design team at her new facility when it purchased Stryker’s Neptune Waste Management System. A constantly closed waste management system with integrated specimen collection (and back-up trap) like Stryker’s new Neptune S helps prevent lost polyps** and protect staff from biohazardous fluid exposure because it reduces the need to empty canisters during a procedure.

Not only does a closed waste management system help address challenges in the GI space, but Hall also believes it contributes to staff retention. Nurses who come to work at her facility are amazed they don’t have to be exposed to GI waste.

“Unfortunately, too many people don’t know what the options are for GI,” Hall says. She has introduced colleagues at other facilities to the innovative technology of a constantly closed system as well. Facilities that adopt a constantly closed waste management system can help protect their staff from splashes and spills, reduce lost specimens and improve reputation because safety is prioritized.

Stop searching through GI waste for lost polyps (2 mm or larger). Stryker’s Neptune S Waste Management System has integrated specimen collection and a back-up trap. Join us on our Journey to Zero* lost polyps** at safeor.com.

Notes: *Zero splash and spills, zero airborne contaminants, zero smoke, zero retained surgical sponges, zero blind spots, zero trips and falls, zero drug diversion, zero maternal harm, zero lost polyps, zero exposure, and zero doubt messages are not guarantees and are aspirational in nature.
**Polyps 2 mm or larger

References:
1. This is a paid interview with a Stryker nurse consultant, conducted March 22, 2023, on behalf of Stryker.

 

How’s the Air in There?

When it comes to storage, airflow is a key variable in keeping reprocessed scopes clean, dry and safe for use... and that’s not all.

As evidence has mounted that residual moisture in and around endoscopes promotes growth of potentially infectious organisms, the methods in which these complex and fragile devices are stored between cases has come under increased scrutiny and regulation. Thankfully, the market is responding with a variety of endoscope storage cabinets that better address patient safety and, particularly, infection prevention.

There are currently three distinct types of cabinets at your disposal. Passive cabinets are ventilated, but no dedicated airflow is directed through them. Active cabinets circulate filtered air throughout the cabinet, but not through the endoscope channels. Forced-air cabinets include built-in circulation systems whose attachments deliver pressurized filtered air directly to each of the scopes’ channels.

“All of these options are based on currently available reprocessing recommendations, so your facility will need to decide how vigilant to be with the ventilation and drying of scopes in storage,” says Kavel Visrodia, MD, assistant professor of medicine in the Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City. “There remains a relative lack of high-level, evidence-based data that compares these three types of systems with endoscope contamination. All three remain effective options for storage based on available guidelines, but endoscopes always should be stored per their manufacturer’s instructions.”

Beyond drying methods, the size and maximum storage capacity of endoscope storage cabinets are also key. There must be enough space in the cabinet for each scope to hang freely, without any scopes touching each other.

Some newer cabinets offer “smart” capabilities, such as the ability to electronically log how long a reprocessed scope has been hanging in storage and inform staff that it needs to be reprocessed because its “shelf life” expired. Others can track the locations of each endoscope using RFID tags. Some forced-air cabinets offer automated drying times that activate at the touch of a button and stop after a predetermined length of time, relieving busy staff from the need to manually shut off a specific scope’s drying system at the correct time.

Security is another crucial issue. Available cabinets range from offering a simple lock and key all the way up to electronic security systems that restrict access to authorized personnel only. Some cabinets can electronically log all staff members who have accessed scopes.

“There is quite a bit of variability on several levels among the endoscope storage cabinets available on the market, and as you add more advanced capabilities, the cost will rise,” notes Dr. Visrodia. “Each endoscopy center will need to weigh the available options carefully and ultimately determine which system best fits their needs to allow for safe and efficient patient care.”

 

Left Lateral Decubitus Patient Position Less Harmful to Endoscopists

Study finds that for most endoscopists, avoidance of ergonomic injury outweighs the right lateral decubitus position’s superior clinical effectiveness.

Endoscopists who perform colonoscopies frequently spend extended time in awkward postures. A new field-based ergonomic study by Canadian researchers examines the comparative risk for musculoskeletal injury among endoscopists who work on patients’ right and left lateral decubitus positions during colonoscopies.

“Patient positioning has a significant impact on the ergonomics of colonoscopy,” says the study published this month in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. “Recent trials have found the right lateral decubitus (RLD) position is associated with quicker insertion, higher adenoma detection rates and greater patient comfort compared to the left lateral decubitus (LLD) position. However, this patient position is perceived as more strenuous by endoscopists.”

Researchers observed 19 endoscopists from the Health Sciences Centre and St. Clare’s Mercy Hospital in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, as they performed 64 colonoscopies during a series of four-hour clinics. The endoscopists’ musculoskeletal injury risk was estimated for the first and last colonoscopies of the shifts using the observational Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool, which scores postures of the upper body and factors such as muscle use, force and load. The higher the RULA score, the higher the risk for musculoskeletal injuries.

The study found that the more strenuous for the endoscopist — but more clinically effective — RLD position was associated with significantly higher RULA scores than the LLD position. Among the endoscopists observed, 89% preferred LLD, primarily due to superior ergonomics and comfort, against only 5% who preferred RLD, with the rest undecided. All who preferred LLD cited physical challenges associated with leaning over the patient in RLD, including back and upper body pain, increased difficulty torquing the scope, and an inability to maintain a neutral wrist posture. The small number who favored RLD reported quicker time to reach the splenic flexure and ease of navigating difficult sigmoid colons.

“The results suggest that the colonoscopy procedure involves musculoskeletal injury risk, and that patient positioning is an important factor influencing the ergonomics of colonoscopy,” the study reports. “Given that colonoscopy is usually performed with a LLD patient position, which favors endoscopist comfort, many endoscopists will likely be reluctant to move patients into the RLD position. This is despite the potential benefits of RLD positioning, including improved mucosal visualization in the cecum and left colon, higher adenoma detection rates in the left colon, and possibly quicker insertion times.”

The study says further effort is needed to improve the ergonomics of colonoscopy. Two potential enhancements the researchers believe could improve the situation are more ergonomic colonoscope designs and/or fully automated colonoscopy insertion devices, and avoidance of deep sedation to facilitate patient position changes.

The researchers say this is the first study to evaluate the ergonomics of RLD patient positioning during colonoscopy. They admit their sample size was small and by no means definitive, and hope it will be replicated in different regions and with larger samples in the future. For administrators of GI centers, however, it provides some sobering evidence of the strain that seemingly simple colonoscopies can wreak on their endoscopists’ bodies. OSM

 

Related Articles