Guidance on Ongoing Port Strike, Hurricane Helene Aftermath
Organizations are offering guidance to surgical facilities that might experience supply chain disruptions from the port workers’ strike and the aftermath of Hurricane Helene....
This website uses cookies. to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept & Close”, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
By: Jared Bilski | Editor-in-Chief
Published: 4/4/2023
If you’re serious about sustainability in the OR, then you’d better be focused on your glove purchasing practices.
There are plenty of reasons to single out this common item, according to Tracey Easthope, MPH, senior strategist at Health Care Without Harm, who served as the lead creator of Practice Greenhealth’s “Guidance for Sustainable Glove Purchasing.” “Gloves have major environmental imp because they’re one of the highest-volume products in health care, and they have significant resource and green house gas (GHS)-use associated with them,” says Ms. Easthope. “They also generate large amounts of waste, contain chemicals of concern and have a problematic supply chain.”
Granted, most facility leaders are not only aware of the impact surgery has on the environment, but they also genuinely want to do their part to mitigate the negative effects of climate change within their control. That said, are busy administrators and directors really supposed to purchase an inferior product just because of a reduced carbon, social and chemical footprint?
Not at all, says Ms. Easthope. “Sustainability criteria are criteria in addition to all the critical functionality, safety and efficacy requirements you demand of your gloving vendors,” she says, adding that responding to requests about green gloving requirements are fast becoming the industry norm. “We can no longer separate sustainability from population health, and therefore patient health,” she says. “Climate change, chemical contamination, increasing pandemics and so many other sustainability issues are driving more patients to the doors of health care, and challenging the resilience of the healthcare sector. Sustainability needs to be one of the most important community conditions attended to by the health sector.”
Of course, sustainability can only become one of these conditions when healthcare facilities start a dialogue with existing vendors about whether their products meet the current recommended criteria regarding sustainability. If this sounds like a daunting undertaking, fear not, as there are a wealth of resources available to help facilities begin their sustainability journey. For instance, Practice Greenhealth — the sister organization of Health Care Without Harm — has more than 20 years of experience helping facilities with these very issues. One prime example is its “Sustainable Procurement Guide,” which leads facilities step by step on integrating sustainability into their procurement processes.
Sustainability criteria are in addition to all the critical functionality, safety and efficacy requirements you require of your gloving vendors. We can no longer separate sustainability from population health, and therefore patient health.
Tracey Easthope, MPH
For sustainability as it pertains specifically to gloving, Health Care Without Harm’s “New sustainability criteria for examination and surgical gloves,” which was just updated in spring 2022, is a treasure trove of practical information for surgical leaders looking to seamlessly weave proven best practices into their processes. For instance, the document breaks down the criteria for suppliers in the areas of supply chain, product specifications and packaging into two main categories:
In other words, the criteria are recommendations your gloving vendors should already be abiding by and those that you hope they’ll consider following some time in the near future. At the very least, vendors should be able to respond to all the required criteria. The packaging section is an area in wich vendors can make major sustainability inroads, because as Ms. Easthope puts it: “There’s no reason that packaging should be anything but sustainable.” Here, the document lists required criteria, including:
Again, the criteria listed above is what environmental organizations believe should be “Required,” but everyone should be working toward specifications in the “Desired” list, like: Supplier has implemented an Extended Producer Responsibility scheme that allows the separate collection of product and packaging waste and supports recycling.
“The desired criteria are higher-bar requirements vendors should start considering,” says Ms. Easthope.
Even if the environmental reasons for practicing sustainable glove purchasing aren’t compelling enough for some vendors just yet, Ms. Easthope says another incentive will likely prevent inertia: market forces. She says that vendors that provide the best and most sustainable product while meeting cost constraints will increasingly be rewarded in the market.
As for facilities that purchase these critical items? “Health systems should also follow the lead of those institutions that are making sure gloves are used appropriately and safely and not overused,” she says. “That is the most sustainable approach.” OSM
This three-part article series is supported by Ansell.
Organizations are offering guidance to surgical facilities that might experience supply chain disruptions from the port workers’ strike and the aftermath of Hurricane Helene....
Each year, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), shines the light on the demanding work preventionists do every day to keep...
If you haven’t had a sharps injury, you might be less inclined to speak up when you are directly handed a used sharp on the sterile field....