A Planning Playbook for Opening a New Orthopedic ASC
The ASC market continues its rapid growth. In 2023, roughly 116 new ASCs opened in the U.S., many of which were orthopedic-specific in nature....
This website uses cookies. to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking “Accept & Close”, you consent to our use of cookies. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
By: Heather Woodward-Hagg
Published: 12/15/2007
We know it's possible to control the transmission of MRSA with proper hand hygiene and screening programs. But small problems can torpedo even the most comprehensive clean-and-screen policies. Whether it's the rushed physician who walks right past the hand sanitizer dispenser or the tech who stops wearing gloves because there aren't enough in the suite, cutting corners on clinical practices while treating a MRSA-infected patient can quickly lead to an outbreak. To prevent this, you need to find and remove the obstacles that make clinical practice guidelines so difficult to follow.
Begin with everyone involved
If people are shortcutting your infection control program, it's not necessarily because they're negligent. It's more likely that they don't know what to do or run into obstacles that make the right thing hard or even impossible to do.
First, find out where the problems are. That means getting input from everyone involved. In a small surgery center, you can accomplish this with a staff meeting, but for larger facilities you may want to create a team of 10 to 12 persons from a wide range of disciplines (don't forget environmental services and supply techs). Ask them what they think is wrong with the current processes related to preventing the transmission of infectious diseases.
This group approach works because often the problems come from isolation, and this gives you a chance to break down barriers between departments. Let everyone say what they see as a problem in front of members from other departments. For example, many facilities have environmental services stock the gowns, but they're already working on another suite before anyone has a chance to let them know that they didn't leave enough.
Once you've identified the problems, the next step is to map out your process to find out the steps involved with these clinical practices, who does what and where the problems are originating in your facility. This will give you and your staff an understanding of the clinical processes, and it can also highlight the importance of teamwork.
Fixing the problems
For infection control practices, particularly procedures designed to prevent the spread of MRSA, you may already have an existing policy requiring staffers to sanitize their hands between patients. But when you sit down with the group, you may uncover excuses: the sanitizers aren't always stocked, they're in an inconvenient location, perhaps the product leaves hands dry and uncomfortable after multiple uses. It's clear you need to make sanitizers easier to access and use. Some ways to do this are to:
Prevention Pointers |
SOAP AND WATER ARE THE BEST AGENTS TO CONTROL CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE, say researchers from the Division of Infectious Diseases at McGill University. Their study, which was presented at the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Chicago, demonstrated how protocols with soap and water proved 98 percent effective when removing C. diff from the hands of 10 volunteers, compared to 95 percent with a disinfectant towel and almost none from an alcohol-based solution. The presenters suggested that the mechanical action of hand washing combined with soap's chemical action effectively eliminated the spores and bacteria while the alcohol only killed the bacteria and left the spores free to reproduce.
|
Equation for sustainability
When you're done with this process, you'll find your infection control policies will become a combination of standardized clinical practice guidelines with realistic implementation strategies. And since your staffers have been heavily involved with the process, they'll understand the reasoning for each measure.
In the hospitals that we work in, we've found that the level of standardization is inversely proportional to the level of staffers' engagement. As a result, we have developed an informal rule to limit standardization of practices to those with supporting evidence of impact to patient outcomes (such as hand hygiene and contact isolation for MRSA). For everything else, including the processes that are developed to implement these practices, we encourage the staff members to get involved and find the solutions that work well for them.
Another benefit to using the whole facility or a facilitated team is that the staffers are invested in the solutions and more apt to follow rules that they set for themselves. They now understand what they have to do and why, so they're not as likely to fall back into their old habits.
The ASC market continues its rapid growth. In 2023, roughly 116 new ASCs opened in the U.S., many of which were orthopedic-specific in nature....
In her 24 years as a nurse at Penn Medicine, Connie Croce has seen the evolution from open to laparoscopic to robotic surgery....
Through my decades of researching, testing and helping implement healthcare design solutions, I’ve learned an important lesson: A human-centered and evidence-based...