Wound Care Wonders

Share:

Alternative closure devices, irrigation fluids and antimicrobial dressings go a long way toward reducing post-op complications.


There are plenty of reasons more surgeons are turning to non-traditional ways to improve their wound-closure techniques and improve the overall healing process. One of the biggest is patient satisfaction. Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA, stumbled upon this benefit during the pandemic. Dr. Cole, a sports medicine specialist at Midwest Orthopedics at Rush in Chicago, was accustomed to seeing his patients eight to 10 days after surgery to remove their sutures. The visits tended to cause patients issues that ranged from mild annoyance to full-on fear. “Some patients had to drive some distance, which was inconvenient, and getting sutures removed can be anxiety-provoking for many because it involves tugging and pulling at a relatively fresh incision,” says Dr. Cole. “Plus, the visits are extremely inefficient and cost-ineffective.”

Luckily, Dr. Cole’s facility had added an alternative wound closure device to its arsenal, and because of the pandemic, telemedicine has become ubiquitous at places where the communication technology had been unused in the past. As a result, Dr. Cole was able to eliminate the traditional post-op suture or staple removal visit because the wound-closure device — a stretchy adhesive with micro-anchors that adhere to the skin to approximate the surgically created skin edges against each other as an alternative to sutures or staples — at his disposal allows patients to put the finishing touches on their surgeries themselves.

“They can very easily remove the device 10 to 12 days after surgery,” says Dr. Cole. “They do it with the help of video instructions we link them to or with written directions we send them home with.”

Of course, this is only one of the ways in which wound care has evolved. Let’s look at what’s new in the world of closure techniques — and how best to decide which method will work best at your facility.

Alternative closure devices. When dealing with non-traumatic surgical wounds, surgeons can opt for traditional closing methods — sutures, staples, glues and tapes — but there are several inherent advantages to more non-invasive options, including improved healing and faster closing times. In addition to allowing his patients to do away with the post-op suture removal visit, the closure device Dr. Cole has been using for approximately two years provides several key benefits.

“The device is clear, so patients can see covered wounds and watch for complications as they heal,” he says. “It also has small drainage holes, so patients can remove excess fluid from the wound if need be.”

The device includes antibacterial components, and significantly reduces the amount of time it takes Dr. Cole to close wounds. “There’s some data that shows it can reduce normal closing time by one-third,” he says. “There are definitely some economic advantages to using it, particularly in terms of OR efficiencies for busy surgery centers.”

Rojeh Melikian, MD, a board-certified orthopedic spine surgeon at DISC Sports & Spine Center in Newport Beach, Calif., sees a host of benefits afforded by the various devices that rely on adhesive strips, adhesive combinations or plastic strips to pull surgical wounds closed. He also acknowledges that the devices are associated with certain limitations, depending on the wound in question. “The most common mistake is trying to apply adhesive strips or skin glues to wounds that have high tension,” he says. “These wounds will likely overwhelm the adhesive strips and pull apart.”

Such wounds, advises Dr. Melikian, are better handled by first using sutures to pull the skin together, which eliminates most of the tension, then finishing the job with adhesive strips.

Antibacterial irrigation options. Surgeons can treat wounds at the end of surgery with antibiotic or antimicrobial irrigation solutions to remove debris and contaminants from the area and reduce the risk of surgical site infections. There are many different antibiotics that can be placed in wound irrigation solutions — such as bacitracin, cefazolin and vancomycin — and these solutions can be tailored to the specific type of surgical wound and the bacteria that’s most likely to be an issue.

Good wound closure practices go a long way toward ensuring positive long-term outcomes of surgery.
— Rojeh Melikian, MD

Whether surgeons use sutures, staples or an alternative closure device, irrigating the wound is a key step that should be added to their surgical routines. “Prior to closure, the surgical wound should be flushed,” says Dr. Melikian.

Antibacterial dressings. In addition to using irrigation solutions and alternative closure devices, wound care can be improved by applying dressings with antibacterial components built directly into them. “These are interesting options,” says Dr. Cole. “They can include silver or alternatives to silver that promote healing.”

However, as he points out, these dressings are a bit controversial in terms of their net effect on wounds. Some data even suggest the dressings offer no benefit when used on clean or closed surgical incisions. 

End results

SHOW OF SUPPORT To ensure surgeons accept the wound closure devices your facility opts to purchase, it’s crucial to get them involved in the trialing and purchasing process.  |  DISC Sports & Spine Center

Dr. Cole sees a facility’s ultimate success in wound closure practices coming down to three key factors: surgeon and patient acceptance, efficacy and cost. While assessing the efficacy of a product is a given for surgical leaders, cost in this case cannot be underestimated — particularly in high-volume facilities.

“There are a number of new closure devices out there, and some options are expensive,” says Dr. Cole. “Using them at the end of each case adds up quickly in outpatient centers that perform thousands of procedures each year.”

Surgeon acceptance is an area most facilities need to focus on when it comes to selecting wound closure devices and adding them to end-of-case protocols. Investing in the most effective and economical product won’t matter if your surgeons won’t use it, points out Dr. Cole.

“You first have to make sure you have a high level of surgeon buy-in,” he says, adding that physicians can be very particular about their wound closure methods and the products they use whether it’s due to a comfort level with a certain type of technique or loyalty to the device they used during training.

Settling on the right device and method can become a balancing act, according to Dr. Cole, because you’re dealing with multiple customers — from materials managers who order supplies to the physicians who are the end users. “Purchasing can be difficult and often requires one-on-one conversations with everyone involved in the decision,” he says.

Ultimately, proper wound closure is a critical issue for surgical facilities, and it pays to be tuned in to the options at your disposal. After all, the consequences of improper wound closure and healing are significant. “We’re always concerned about the risk of infection, even though it’s very low — probably somewhere in the one to three percent range,” says Dr. Cole. “But there also are more common long-term consequences of improper wound healing such as hypertrophic scars and keloids.”

Dr. Melikian says an otherwise uneventful surgery complicated by a wound infection or unexpected scar can be devastating to patients. “Good wound closure practices go a long way toward ensuring positive long-term outcomes of surgery,” he says.

With all the innovations that are occurring in the wound-care space in recent years, expectations of positive outcomes should be standard practice in your facility. OSM

Related Articles

April 25, 2024

Growing demand for anesthesia services at ASCs is being met with a dwindling supply of anesthesia providers....

Make an Impact With Small Moves

Improvements in both workflow and staff attitudes are part of a leader’s responsibilities, but your interventions in these areas don’t need to be major to make...